| 工业品外观设计专利侵权的认定 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杨勇胜. 工业品外观设计专利侵权的认定[J]. 太原理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 22(2): 27-30 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杨勇胜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江师范大学,法政经济学院,浙江,金华,321004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 专利产品的保护范围和近似外观设计的判定是外观设计专利侵权认定的基础。同类产品的判定应参照外观设计分类表,并考虑产品的具体情况。外观设计的构成要素相同或相近似是决定外观设计相同或相近似的因素。外观设计的相同或相近似应以产品所属领域的普通消费者是否容易混淆为判断标准。公用性和功能性内容是外观设计专利侵权的抗辩事由。
|
| 关 键 词： | 外观设计 专利侵权 专利产品 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-5837(2004)02-0027-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-01-13 |
Criteria for Industrial Design Infringement |
| |
| YANG Yong-sheng. Criteria for Industrial Design Infringement[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2004, 22(2): 27-30 |
| |
| Authors: | YANG Yong-sheng |
| |
| Abstract: | It is essential to determine the legal protection range of the patented product and the similarity of industrial design in a patent infringement case, and the industrial design list and factors of product should be considered then. Homologous or similar elements carries with corresponding homology or similarity of industrial design, and the judger should be the relevant common consumer to the patent product. Parts for public use and functional segments are the pleas of industrial design infringement. |
| |
| Keywords: | industrial surface design patent infringement patented product |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
