首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

滥用职权罪的客观要件解释
引用本文:胡乾坤,陈智元.滥用职权罪的客观要件解释[J].北华大学学报(社会科学版),2004,5(1):78-80,F003.
作者姓名:胡乾坤  陈智元
作者单位:中国政法大学,研究生院,北京,100088;中国政法大学,研究生院,北京,100088
摘    要:构成滥用职权罪的行为同时具有刑法上和行政法上之双重意义.刑法意义上之"超越职权"与"行政越权"并非完全同一;"违反规定处理公务"包括行政自由裁量权的滥用与羁束权的滥用;"行政不作为"犯罪定性的关键,在于认定行为人行为时的主观心理.滥用职权罪的立法需完善,核心在于罪名分解,并注意保持刑法与行政法的协调统一.

关 键 词:滥用职权  超越职权  自由裁量权  羁束权  行政不作为  立法完善
文章编号:1009-5101(2004)01-0078-04
修稿时间:2003年9月1日

On Defining the Objective Composition of the Crime of Abusing Administrative Power
HU Qian-kun,CHEN Zhi-yuan.On Defining the Objective Composition of the Crime of Abusing Administrative Power[J].Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences),2004,5(1):78-80,F003.
Authors:HU Qian-kun  CHEN Zhi-yuan
Abstract:The act of abusing administrative power has double meanings, concerning both criminal law and administrative law. We must distinguish power-exceeding in the criminal law from the exceeding of administrative power. Abusing administrative power includes abusing the discretionary power and the non-discretionary power. The administrative omission constitutes the crime ,the key lies in the actors mental state. The suggestion of legislative improvement is that the accusation should be decomposed,meanwhile , keep the coordination between criminal law and administrative law.
Keywords:Abusing of administrative power  Power-exceeding  Discretionary power  Non-discretionary power  Administrative omission  Legislative improvement
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号