首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

大流士与秦始皇治国方略辨异——兼论波斯帝国延祚和秦帝国速亡之原因
引用本文:陈德正.大流士与秦始皇治国方略辨异——兼论波斯帝国延祚和秦帝国速亡之原因[J].齐鲁学刊,2002(6):121-126.
作者姓名:陈德正
作者单位:北京师范大学 历史系,北京 100875
摘    要:大流士、秦始皇在建立大一统的专制帝国后 ,为巩固统治采取了类似的改革措施。但在为政治国方略的实施过程中两者却表现出巨大差异 :大流士对被征服地区的政治控制较为宽松、经济剥削较为适度、文化政策比较宽容 ;秦始皇在统一中国后则政治统治走向极端专制独裁、经济贪欲恶性膨胀、思想文化统得过死。两人不同的为政治国方略是导致波斯帝国延祚和秦帝国速亡的重要原因

关 键 词:大流士  秦始皇  治国方略
文章编号:1001-022X(2002)06-0121-06
修稿时间:2001年10月15

Compare the Governing Strategies of Emperor Drius and Qin Shihuang——And Disguss the Reasons for the Empire Persian Long Ruleand Qin' Quickly Destruction
CHEN De,zheng.Compare the Governing Strategies of Emperor Drius and Qin Shihuang——And Disguss the Reasons for the Empire Persian Long Ruleand Qin'' Quickly Destruction[J].Qilu Journal,2002(6):121-126.
Authors:CHEN De  zheng
Abstract:Founding the united autocratic empire, emperor Darius and Qin Shihuang took similar reformation measures in order to consolidate their domination. But what was differeis the process of their governing policy: Emperor Darius controlled the conquered area comparatively loosely, exploited the people moderately and was lenient in his cultural policy; On the contrary, after emperor Qin Shihuang united China, his political domination trended extremely tyrannically, his economic greedy lust expanded and his culture rule strengthened. From the above ,we can see easily that it was their different fates -Persian long rule but Qin's quick destrution .
Keywords:Darius  Qin Shihuang  Governing Strategy Compare  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号