Analysis of repeated categorical responses from fully and partially cross-classified data |
| |
Authors: | Michael Haber Catherine C. H. Chen C. David Williamson |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Division of Biostatistics , Emory University School of Public Health , Atlanta, 30322, Georgia;2. Epidemiology Program Office , Centers for Disease Control , Atlanta, 30333, Georgia |
| |
Abstract: | Many follow-up studies involve categorical data measured on the same individual at different times. Frequently, some of the individuals are missing one or more of the measurements. This results in a contingency table with both fully and partially cross-classified data. Two models can be used to analyze data of this type: (i) The multiple-sample model, in which all the study subjects with the same configuration of missing observations are considered a separate sample. (ii) The single-sample model, which assumes that the missing observations are the result of a mechanism causing subjects to lose the informtion from one or some of the measurements. In this work we compare the two approaches and show that under certain conditions, the two models yield the same maximum likelihood estimates of the cell probabilities in the underlying contingency table. |
| |
Keywords: | contingency tables ignorable nonresponse linear models] marginal conformity maximum likelihood repeated measurements |
|
|