犯罪论体系去“苏俄化”观点再商榷

将四要件的犯罪构成理论冠以"苏俄化"的标签,并不恰当。四要件中的犯罪构成与三阶层中的构成要件之本质区别在于二者赖以建立的哲学基础不同,两套犯罪论体系所反映的是两种不同的思维模式。在人权保障方面,寄希望于构成要件理论,或者将实践中出现的人权侵犯现象归咎于四要件的犯罪构成理论,并不正确。俄罗斯刑事法制领域的人权保障,不是从刑法典内部、更不是靠某种理论,而是通过相应的制度建设来实现的。

Further Discussion of the Non-Russianization of Criminal Theory System

It is not proper to label the four-element theory of the constitution of crime as Russianization.The difference between the constitution of crime in the four-element theory and the constructive requirements of the three-level theory lies in their different philosophical basis and the two sets of criminal theory system also reflect two modes of thinking.As regards to protect human rights,it is not correct to rely on the constructive requirements theory or impute the violation of human rights in practice to the four-element theory.In Russian criminal law system,the protection of human rights is realized nerther via the items of the criminal law itself,nor some kind of theory,but via the construction of corresponding institutional framework.