| 论电子认证机构民事责任的归责原则 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘颖,孙志煜. 论电子认证机构民事责任的归责原则[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007, 29(6): 26-32 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘颖 孙志煜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 暨南大学法学院,广东,广州,510632;暨南大学法学院,广东,广州,510632 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 广东省社会科学规划项目《计算机信息交易法律问题研究》(批准号:05G-05)，国家社会科学基金项目《经济全球化与中国电子商务法律研究》(批准号:07BFX-079) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国《电子签名法》从单一经济利益角度出发,将电子认证机构民事责任的归责原则规定为过错原则,无论是从立法技术还是利益平衡来看,此归责原则略显僵化。电子认证机构民事责任的归责原则应区分违约、侵权两种不同行为,电子认证机构承担民事责任的归责原则应为无过错责任原则。
|
| 关 键 词： | 电子认证机构 归责原则 无过错责任原则 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5072(2007)06-0026-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-12-28 |
On the Doctrine of Liability Fixation of Civil Liability of Certification Authorities |
| |
| LIU Ying,SUN Zhi-yu. On the Doctrine of Liability Fixation of Civil Liability of Certification Authorities[J]. Journal of Jinan University, 2007, 29(6): 26-32 |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Ying SUN Zhi-yu |
| |
| Abstract: | The Electronic Signature Act has specified the principle of fault liability which should be refered to when fixing the civil liability of certification authorities.Such principle seems to be rigid in terms of both legislative skills and balance of interests.The thesis,by analyzing the difference between certification authority and electronic signer or electronic signature,holds that the civil liability of certificatim authorities should be indentified as two different types of action: breach of contract and infringement of rights.Therefore,what cerafiecation authorite should take ought to be non-fault liability. |
| |
| Keywords: | certification authority doctrine of liability fixation principle of no-fault liability |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
