A Systematic Review of the Assessment of Quality of Life in Adolescents |
| |
Authors: | Losada-Puente Luisa Araújo Alexandra M. Muñoz-Cantero Jesús Miguel |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.School of Management, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, People’s Republic of China ;2.State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, School of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, People’s Republic of China ;3.Department of Civil Engineering, Joongbu University, Goyang-si, Gyeunggi-do, 10279, Republic of Korea ; |
| |
Abstract: | This study examined how the quality of life (QoL) affects an individual’s disaster preparedness behavior (PB); furthermore, it also considered and examined the mediating effects of trust in government (GT) and the moderating effects of self-efficacy (SE). One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to test the differences in QoL, GT, SE, and PB, by socio-demographic, and the study hypotheses were verified by using hierarchical regression analysis based on 1682 samples. The Johnson–Neyman technique was used to test the conditional effects of SE on QoL and PB. All the hypotheses presented in this study were supported: (1) QoL had a positive effect on PB; (2) QoL had a positive effect on GT; (3) GT had a positive effect on PB; (4) GT mediated the relationship between QoL and PB; (5) SE moderated the relationship between QoL and PB. Specifically, when SE was high, the positive relationship between QoL and PB increased; (6) SE moderated the relationship between GT and PB. Specifically, when SE was high, the positive relationship between GT and PB increased; and (7) SE moderated the indirect effect of QoL on PB. Specifically, when SE was high, the mediating effect of GT on the relationship between QoL and PB increased. This study makes significant contributions in terms of identifying the mechanisms of QoL on PB based on the moderated mediation model. Improving individuals’ QoL is not only an important societal goal, but also an effective way to enhance people’s positive behavioral outcomes. Therefore, QoL improvement should be considered in the top-level design of government policies, and it should also be regarded as an important indicator of government performance assessment. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|