首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

法定刑以下处刑核准制度的改革与完善
引用本文:窦云鸽,;肖江峰.法定刑以下处刑核准制度的改革与完善[J].河北工业大学学报:社会科学...,2014(4):32-38.
作者姓名:窦云鸽  ;肖江峰
作者单位:[1]天津公安警官职业学院教务处,天津300191; [2]北京市高级人民法院刑事审判第一庭,北京100022
摘    要:法定刑以下处刑核准制度,是立法者考虑到犯罪和法律适用的双重复杂性,为在特殊案件中做到量刑适当而作出的专门规定。但由于对何为"特殊情况"认识不一、核准程序繁琐、核准期限过长等原因,这一制度基本被虚置。"许霆案"之后,学界与实务部门改革完善这一制度的呼声渐高。应放宽实体标准,寻求自由裁量权与罪刑法定的平衡点,简化与完善核准程序,以消除程序的消极影响和制约。

关 键 词:法定刑  判处刑罚  实体条件  特殊情况  程序完善

Reform and Improvement of the Approval System below the Legal Punishment Execution
Institution:DU Yun-fei, LIAN Jian-xin, ZHANG Ai-guo, HU Bao-min ( School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China )
Abstract:The examination and approval system of particular sentencing not enough for legally prescribed punishment is a special provision designed to ensure appropriate sentencing under exceptional circumstances. During the sentencing process, legislators will take into account dual complexity of the crime and the legal applicability. However, due to non-uniform understanding of what "exceptional circumstances" in fact are, cumbersome examination and approval procedures, lengthy approval period thus come up and make this system basically exist in name only.Following the "Xu Ting Case", voices emerging from both the academic sector and the actual practice divisions for reforming and improving the institution are getting louder and louder. We propose in this article that standards of its substantiality should be relaxed, a balance point between judging freely and sentencing in accordance with the law should be sought, and the examination and approval procedures should be simplified and improved in order to eliminate any negative impacts and constraints of this process.
Keywords:statutory sentence  award punishment  substantive conditions  special circumstances  improvement of procedure
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号