论"重写文学史"书写困境的形成

"重写文学史"的提出,受到了社会的关注与肯定,其理论前提是将"启蒙"与"现代化"作为20世纪中国社会的主题。但其后,反观"重写文学史"的实践,与其初衷不尽相符。反差的形成,理论上是缘于"启蒙"与"现代化"思维,并不具备足够的能量和容量说明历史与时代,反而陷入了另一种意识形态思维的迷惘中。同时,"重写"所秉持的"审美与艺术"先行的估价尺度,使得"重写"的考察视阈受到限制、遮蔽;审美的偏执,相应也不可避免地带来历史隔膜,这造成了"重写"不能按照其理论预设的"宏大叙事"顺利展开。文学史的重写虽存在困境,但以往文学史的写作模式,必然要有所创新,坚持以文学为主题,以史识为主体是其应取之道。

The Dilemma of "Rewriting the History of Literature"

The concept of "Rewriting the history of literature" has received attention and been accepted and its theoretical background is enlightenment and modernization.But its practice does not closely follow its goal.The cause of this difference is the inability of enlightenment and modernization to interpret history and being trapped in another ideological confusion.At the same time,this re-writing is limited and blocked by its perspective due to its aesthetics and art-first evaluation criterion.The biased aesthetic view unavoidably brings forward historical separation and cannot successfully be implemented according to its theoretical presupposition of a broad narrative.The literary writing mode of the past must be innovated and it should adhere to the literary theme and the historical subject.