| 中国产品出口欧盟受到的技术性贸易壁垒分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙海燕,洪涓. 中国产品出口欧盟受到的技术性贸易壁垒分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2005, 5(3): 36-40 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙海燕 洪涓 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京工业大学,经济与管理学院,北京,100022 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对中国产品出口欧盟受到的技术性贸易壁垒(TBT)进行了分析,指出欧盟是最先意识到采用TBT和目前设置TBT最多的国家集团,在中欧贸易平稳发展的同时,欧盟为保护自身利益设置的技术性贸易壁垒已成为中国出口的最大障碍。认为动态博弈理论能够为欧盟设置技术性贸易壁垒提供理论依据,同时技术性贸易壁垒对双方都产生了双重影响,并且这种影响是弊大于利的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 欧盟 技术性贸易壁垒 动态博弈论 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-0398（2005）03-0036-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 2004-11-18 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-11-18 |
The Analysis of EU''''s TBT to the Trade Between China and EU |
| |
| SUN Hai-yan,HONG Juan. The Analysis of EU''''s TBT to the Trade Between China and EU[J]. Journal of Beijing Polytechnic University(Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 5(3): 36-40 |
| |
| Authors: | SUN Hai-yan HONG Juan |
| |
| Abstract: | EU is TBT pioneer and has the most TBT measures at present. When the trade between China and EU developed steadily, EU puts up TBT to protect its benefit .And it has been the biggest barriers provide a theoretic base sides, and abuse of TBT that China will face in the export to EU. Dynamic game theory can for EU setting is bound to be TBT. Actually TBT has two-faces effects on more negative than benefited on either side |
| |
| Keywords: | EU TBT Dynamic Game Theory |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
