首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论我国生态侵权损害的司法救济
引用本文:邹士超. 论我国生态侵权损害的司法救济[J]. 创新, 2012, 6(5): 72-77,127
作者姓名:邹士超
作者单位:西南政法大学经济法学院
摘    要:生态侵权突破了传统法学理论对生态损害的研究,它将权利救济对象延伸至基于生态环境的损害而遭受不利影响的其他法律主体。生态侵权损害司法救济理论研究发端于生态侵权损害救济的实践困境,致力于司法实践中生态侵权损害受害人的权利救济,构筑于无过错责任原则理论根基之上。在无过错责任原则指导下,盖然性因果关系学说在生态侵权责任构成理论中具有不可替代的作用,具体表现在原告对两个因果关系的相当程度盖然性标准的肯定性举证,以及被告对两个因果关系的高度盖然性标准的否定性举证,二者构成了生态侵权责任构成理论的核心。

关 键 词:生态侵权  生态损害  权利救济  生态侵权责任

On the Judiciary Remedies for the Damages of Ecological Tort in China
ZOU Shi-chao. On the Judiciary Remedies for the Damages of Ecological Tort in China[J]. Innovation, 2012, 6(5): 72-77,127
Authors:ZOU Shi-chao
Affiliation:ZOU Shi-chao
Abstract:Ecological tort makes breakthrough in the study of the ecological damages with traditional legal theory.It extends the object of right relief to other legal bodies who suffer from negative impacts due to ecological damages.Originated from the dilemma of remedies for ecological damages and based on the principle of liability without fault,the study of judiciary remedies for damages in ecological tort focuses on the right relief for the victims of ecological torts.Under the principle of liability without fault,the theory of probability in casual relationships cannot be replaced in the constitution of responsibilities of ecological torts,which is reflected in two cores,that is,the plaintiff’s fairly probable affirmative proof and the defendant’s highly probable negative proof on two casual relationships.
Keywords:ecological tort  ecological damage  judiciary remedies  the responsibilities of ecological torts
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号