Calendars and keys: The classification of “home” and “work” |
| |
Authors: | Christena Nippert-Eng |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Social Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, 3101 S. Dearborn, Rm. 232 LS, 60616 Chicago, Illinois |
| |
Abstract: | This article presents a discussion of the relationship between classification systems and individuals' everyday activities. The concept of “boundary work” is defined as the practices that concretize and give meaning to mental frameworks by placing, maintaining, and challenging cultural categories. “Home” and “work” provide a case study for examining boundary work across a range of realm relationships, from those that are highly “integrating” to those that are highly “segmenting.” Boundary practices involving calendars and keys, clothes and appearances, eating and drinking, money, people and their representations (like photographs and gifts), talk styles and conversations, reading materials and habits, and work breaks (including lunches and vacations) are discussed. Mary Douglas's work on categorical purity helps illustrate the relationship between cognitive order and visible behavior seen in the boundary work of home and work. This article includes material that was published in a larger study,Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries Through Everyday Life (1996 University of Chicago Press), after it was presented at the 1995 Eastern Sociological Society meetings in Philadelphia. |
| |
Keywords: | work home boundaries classification culture practices everyday life |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|