| 存在与谓词 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 戴劲.存在与谓词[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,32(4):99-105. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 戴劲 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学,哲学学院,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文围绕对"是(存在)"的探究追溯了康德以来的谓词理论,并分析了由康德式谓词观中一个理论缺口所引发的问题。由于康德没有对逻辑谓词给予说明,引出了"是(存在)"能否成为事物概念的谓词这一问题。最后,笔者通过对谓词重新分类并对sein的译名、意思、作用三个层次予以总结来解决此问题,从而使其缺口得以修复。
|
| 关 键 词： | 谓词 是(存在) 康德 |
| 文章编号： | 1005-6378(2007)04-0099-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年5月20日 |
Being and Predicate |
| |
| DAI Jin.Being and Predicate[J].Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science),2007,32(4):99-105. |
| |
| Authors: | DAI Jin |
| |
| Abstract: | This article dates back to the predicate theory from Kant period embracing the research of "being(existence)",and analyzes a theoretical omission in Kant's predicate theory which induced the problems.It is the reason that Kant did not explain the logical predicates which make us doubt that "being(existence)" becomes the concept's predicate of things.Then,in order to solve this problem and amend the omission,the author reclassifies the predicates,and expounds the translated term,the meaning and the function of sein. |
| |
| Keywords: | predicate being(existence) Kant |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
