| 试论表见代理 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴国平.试论表见代理[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(4):34-38. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴国平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 福建省政法管理干部学院,福建,福州,350007 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国《合同法》首次规定了表见代理制度,但范围略显然狭窄,还应当进一步加以完善。表见代理在性质上与无权代理和有权代理有着明显的差别,应属于一种独立类型的代理。表见代理中的行为人与相对人所进行的必须是民事法律行为,其法律后果直接归于本人,并产生与有权代理相同的法律后果。
|
| 关 键 词： | 表见代理 无权代理 性质 构成要件 形态 效力 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-2638(2006)04-0034-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年1月15日 |
Agency by Estoppel |
| |
| WU Guo-ping.Agency by Estoppel[J].Journal of Qiqihar University (Philosophy & Social Science Edition),2006(4):34-38. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Guo-ping |
| |
| Abstract: | The system of agency of estoppel,which is stipulated in Contract Law of our country for the first time,should be further perfected for its narrow range.Agency of estoppel is different from representative without authority and authorized agency in nature,and it is an independent kind of agency.What actors and the opposite party for agency of estoppel do should be civil juristic act,and its legal consequence belongs to the principal;meanwhile it has the same legal consequence as authorized agency. |
| |
| Keywords: | agency of estoppel representative without authority nature component requirements formation validity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
