| 语用推理与组构习语语义的推理模式 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐景亮.语用推理与组构习语语义的推理模式[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009,13(4):120-123. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐景亮 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江苏技术师范学院,外国语学院,江苏,常州,213001 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 江苏省2009年度高枝哲学社科基金项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 习语的语义与其组成成分的意义之间的关系通常被认为是任意性的。而习语组构观指出,实际情况并非完全如此,从成分意义可以推理还原习语义。但推理是怎样运作的？对此,包括主张习语具组构性的构造假设理论都未作论述。组构习语语义的推理与日常话语意义的认知语用推理相似,需要三类认知推理构件的共同参与：（1）表征习语成分概念的词汇、逻辑和百科知识等信息;（2）认知语境;（3）推理者的认知心理状态。推理过程对探索组构习语语义的推理模式具启发性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 语用推理 组构习语 语义推理 推理机制 推理模式 |
Pragmatic Inference and the Semantic Construction of English Idioms |
| |
| XU Jing-liang.Pragmatic Inference and the Semantic Construction of English Idioms[J].Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition),2009,13(4):120-123. |
| |
| Authors: | XU Jing-liang |
| |
| Institution: | XU Jing-liang (School of Foreign Languages, Jiangsu Teachers University of Technology, Changzhou 213001, Jiangsu, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The relationship is generally viewed as arbitrary between the meaning and the components of English idioms. However, according to the view of the current compositional idioms, it is not completely arbitrary and the meaning of idioms can be inferred from the components. However, the inferring mechanism has been under-researched, even in configuration hypothesis. This article holds that their cognitive inference mechanism is similar to that of the daily utterance. The successful inference demands the participation of three cognitive processing elements： the encoded lexical, logic and encyclopedic information of each component; contextual information; learners＇ cognitive state. |
| |
| Keywords: | pragmatic inference idioms semantic inference inferring mechanism inferring mode |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
