首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论汪懋麟与施闰章、徐乾学唐宋诗之争——兼论清初翰林院内外诗风差异
引用本文:潘务正. 论汪懋麟与施闰章、徐乾学唐宋诗之争——兼论清初翰林院内外诗风差异[J]. 淮海工学院学报(社会科学版), 2009, 7(2): 49-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3499.2009.02.013
作者姓名:潘务正
作者单位:安徽师范大学,中国诗学研究中心,安徽,芜湖,241000
基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目 
摘    要:汪懋麟与施闰章、徐乾学之间关于唐宋诗之争是清初诗坛令人关注的事件。清代翰林院诗学重唐,而反对宋诗。汪懋麟和施闰章之间的诗学争论关涉到历史上翰林与主事诗歌主张的矛盾;汪氏和徐乾学之间的诗学论争则关涉到翰林院的"玉堂家数"与失意文人"不平则鸣"思想的对立。总之他们之间的诗学之争深刻反映了清初翰林院内外诗风的巨大差异。

关 键 词:汪懋麟  施闰章  徐乾学  翰林院  唐宋诗之争

On the Debate on Poetry of the Tang and Song Dynasties by Wang Maolin,Shi Runzhang and Xu Qianxue
PAN Wu-zheng. On the Debate on Poetry of the Tang and Song Dynasties by Wang Maolin,Shi Runzhang and Xu Qianxue[J]. Journal of Huaihai Institute of Technology, 2009, 7(2): 49-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3499.2009.02.013
Authors:PAN Wu-zheng
Affiliation:Research Center of Chinese Poetics;Anhui Normal University;Wuhu 241000;China
Abstract:The debate on poetry by three scholars was too conspicuous to ignore in the early days of the Qing Dynasty.The Imperial Academy at that time prioritized the Tang Poetry whereas sneered at the Song Poetry.The debate between Wang Maolin and Shi Runzhang embodied that of the members and director of the Imperial Academy while the argument between Wang and Xu Qianxue highlighted two opposing concepts proposed by the Imperial Academy and frustrated men of letters.Hence their debates reflected the discrepant poeti...
Keywords:Wang Maolin  Shi Runzhang  Xu Qianxue  Imperial Academy  debate on poetry of the Tang and Song Dynasties  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号