| 举证时限制度适用中的若干问题探析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 蒲菊花.举证时限制度适用中的若干问题探析[J].宁波大学学报(人文科学版),2005,18(1):31-35. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 蒲菊花 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 宁波大学,法学院,浙江,宁波,315211 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》明确规定了举证时限制度,标志着我国民事诉讼从证据随时提出主义向证据适时提出主义的嬗变。为实现举证时限制度的功效,举证期限原则上应当限定在审前准备程序阶段,具体期限的确定包括法院指定和当事人约定两种方式。当事人逾越举证期限时,除非对方当事人同意质证或者其所提出的证据构成新证据,否则将发生证据失权的后果。
|
| 关 键 词： | 举证时限 证据失权 证据交换 新证据 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-05124(2005)01-0031-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年10月18 |
About Issues in the Time Limit of Evidence Rules |
| |
| PU Ju-hua.About Issues in the Time Limit of Evidence Rules[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Liberal Arts Edition),2005,18(1):31-35. |
| |
| Authors: | PU Ju-hua |
| |
| Abstract: | The Rules of Evidence in Civil Litigation by the Supreme People Court requires that litigating parties should provide evidence in time. According to the rules, evidential time should be limited in the pretrial procedure stage. When a party exceeds the time limit, the evidence provided by him will be invalid unless it can be viewed as new evidence or the opposite party consent to examine it. |
| |
| Keywords: | time limit of producing evidence invalid evidence evidence exchange |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
