首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

梁启超与康德"趣味"说之比较
引用本文:李必桂.梁启超与康德"趣味"说之比较[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2003,16(3):319-321.
作者姓名:李必桂
作者单位:武汉理工大学,艺术与设计学院,湖北,武汉,430070
摘    要:“趣味”在梁启超和康德的美学思想中占有极重要的地位。本文从趣味的规定、趣味与情感、趣味与目的等几个方面来比较他们的“趣味”说,可以发现:梁启超对趣味、情感的理解是经验性的,而康德则强调趣味的先验特征和快感的纯粹性,但在趣味与目的的关系上,他们都持有类似的矛盾态度。实际上,趣味与目的的关系问题只是在形而上学美学的维度之内才能成立。

关 键 词:梁启超  康德  趣味  经验  先验
文章编号:1671-6477(2003)03-0319-03
修稿时间:2002年10月16

A Comparison between Kant's and Liang Qichao's Views of Taste
LI Bi-gui.A Comparison between Kant''s and Liang Qichao''s Views of Taste[J].Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Social Science Edition),2003,16(3):319-321.
Authors:LI Bi-gui
Abstract:Taste is important to the aesthetic thought of Kant and Liangqichang. This article tries to compare two thinkers views of taste from aspects of the determination of taste and the relation of tast-e to feeling and end . By comparison,we draw a conclusion that Liang qichao's understanding of taste and feeling is empirical, Kant however emphsized the transcendental quality of taste and the pureness of pleasure. But they showed the same contradictory attitude to the relation between taste and end. In fact,the problem of the relation of taste and end is possible only in the horizon of matephysical aesthetics.
Keywords:taste  empirical  transcendentalism
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号