| 人民法院提起刑事再审程序合理性质疑 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李元勇.人民法院提起刑事再审程序合理性质疑[J].西华师范大学学报(自然科学版),2002(6):47-50. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李元勇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广西右江民族师专政史系 广西百色533000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 人民法院提起刑事再审程序是这一程序启动的方式之一 ,这种启动方式存在诸多弊端 ,不符合诉讼规律 ,使审判监督程序的公正性蒙上阴影。只有改变这种不科学的启动方式 ,审判监督程序的功能才能得到真正的发挥
|
| 关 键 词： | 审判监督程序 合理性 质疑 |
| 文章编号： | 1005-1465(2002)06-0047-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年8月15日 |
SENSIBLE DOUBTS ABOUT THE INITIATION OF THE CRIMINAL RETRIAL PROCEDURE BY THE PEOPLES' COURT |
| |
| LI Yuan-yong.SENSIBLE DOUBTS ABOUT THE INITIATION OF THE CRIMINAL RETRIAL PROCEDURE BY THE PEOPLES'' COURT[J].Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences,2002(6):47-50. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Yuan-yong |
| |
| Abstract: | The initiation of the criminal retrial procedure by people's court is one of the ways to start this procedure, which accords with neither the legal provisions nor the procedural laws, and casts a slur over the impartiality in the judical and supervising procedure. Only by changing this unscientific way can the functions of the judical and supervising procedure be fully performed. |
| |
| Keywords: | judical and supervisting procedure sensibility doubt |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
