| 母性、女性和人性:女权求索路上的思考——女权主义视角下《觉醒》与《金色笔记》之比较解读 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 边克攀.母性、女性和人性:女权求索路上的思考——女权主义视角下《觉醒》与《金色笔记》之比较解读[J].河南理工大学学报(社会科学版),2010,11(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 边克攀 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 沈阳工程学院公共外语教学部,沈阳,110136 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 沈阳工程学院青年基金 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 1899年出版的凯特·肖邦的代表作《觉醒》与1962年出版的多丽丝·莱辛的《金色笔记》同被视为女权主义的经典作品。通过对两部作品中各自时代背景下女权艰难求索的解读,认为这两部作品共同呈现了女权求索道路上的绊脚石——传统菲勒斯中心(父权中心)文化势力,也共同探讨了似乎更难以解决的矛盾———母性、女性和人性同女权求索之间的矛盾。对于此问题的解决方式,两部作品则表现出了相异性,即相对《觉醒》的时代局限性,《金色笔记》体现了在女权发展问题上相对的理性和前瞻性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文作品 女权主义 两性和谐 |
Motherood,Womanhood and Human Nature:The Interpretation and Understanding of the Road of the Feminist A Comparative Study of Awakening and The Golden Notebook from Feminism Perspective |
| |
| BIAN Ke-pan.Motherood,Womanhood and Human Nature:The Interpretation and Understanding of the Road of the Feminist A Comparative Study of Awakening and The Golden Notebook from Feminism Perspective[J].Journal of Jiaozuo Institute of Technology(Social Sciences),2010,11(1). |
| |
| Authors: | BIAN Ke-pan |
| |
| Abstract: | American writer Kate Chopin’s masterpiece Awakening and British writer Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook are both viewed as classical feminist works,which were respectively published in 1899 and 1962. By interpreting the hard pursuit feminist of in the two novels,this paper holds the opinion that in addition to the Phallocentrism viewed as the block of feminist,the two novels both have reflected on the harder problems on the road of the feminist pursuit: motherhood,womanhood and human nature. And the corresponding resolutions differ from each other in the two novels. Compared to the historical limita-tion showed in Awakening,The Golden Notebook has revealed its relatively more rational and far-sighted view on the development of feminism. |
| |
| Keywords: | literary works feminism harmony of men and women |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
