首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

言论自由的反讽,反讽什么——重读费斯教授的《言论自由的反讽》
引用本文:邓云成,邓淼. 言论自由的反讽,反讽什么——重读费斯教授的《言论自由的反讽》[J]. 重庆交通学院学报(社会科学版), 2011, 0(2): 32-35
作者姓名:邓云成  邓淼
作者单位:上海交通大学凯原法学院;重庆大学文学与新闻传媒学院;
摘    要:美国历史上,学者们通常都是在以国家为敌的前提下探讨言论自由,而费斯教授在其名著《言论自由的反讽》中,却提出关于以国家为敌的言论自由的三个错误:言论"沉寂化"效应、国家作为"配给者"角色的缺失、"公平原则"的漠视,费斯教授认为国家也可能成为言论自由的朋友。结合这一理论,充分认识中美两国言论自由的不同背景,可以以新程序主义为进路推动我国言论自由的进程。

关 键 词:言论自由  反讽  新程序正义

Irony of Free Speech,For What Reviewing Prof. Fiss' The Irony of Free Speech
DENG Yun-cheng,DENG Miao. Irony of Free Speech,For What Reviewing Prof. Fiss' The Irony of Free Speech[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition), 2011, 0(2): 32-35
Authors:DENG Yun-cheng  DENG Miao
Affiliation:DENG Yun-cheng1,DENG Miao2(1.Koguan Law School,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China,2.School of Literature and Journalism,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China)
Abstract:In the history of the USA,scholars usually debated free speech under the premise of being hostile to the nation,but Prof.Fiss points out three mistakes of argument in his The Irony of Free Speech as follows: the effect upon silencing dynamic of speech,the deficiency of the state acting as a distributor,the oblivion of equity principles.So Fiss was of the opinion that the state might become friend of free speech to some extent.With this theory and under the basis of full understanding of different background...
Keywords:free speech  irony  new procedure justice  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号