首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

《管子》中都四子本与南宋初浙刻本的比较
引用本文:郭丽.《管子》中都四子本与南宋初浙刻本的比较[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2006,12(1):103-106.
作者姓名:郭丽
作者单位:浙江大学人文学院,浙江,杭州,310028
摘    要:明弘治七年朱东光刻印的中都四子本《管子》,系据刘绩《管子补注》翻刻。与南宋初绍兴年间刊印的浙江刻本相比较,四子本更注重用字的规范化和正规化;收录二十余条通行本没有的注解,是在原《管子注》的基础上做的修订与提高;用字能订正浙刻本及通行本的讹误;补充浙刻本没有的句子,使《管子》篇章更为完善;《四时》《霸言》《版法》篇章顺序与浙刻本有不同,后两篇以浙刻本顺序为是。四子本脱文、衍文、漏注情况比较严重,注解与浙刻本亦有很大不同。清代学者王念孙、戴望均参考四子本以订正通行本。

关 键 词:管子中都四子本  管子南宋初浙江刻本
文章编号:1672-3104(2006)01-0103-04
修稿时间:2005年9月30日

Guanzi: a comparative analysis of Zhonglisizi edition with Nan Song Dynasty Zhejiang edition
GUO Li.Guanzi: a comparative analysis of Zhonglisizi edition with Nan Song Dynasty Zhejiang edition[J].Journal of Central South Huiversity: Social Science,2006,12(1):103-106.
Authors:GUO Li
Abstract:In Ming Dynasty,in the seventh year of Hongzhi Emperor,Zhonglisizi edition was reprinted from Liuji's edition.It had different words with Zhejiang edition in Nan Song Dynasty.Zhonglisizi edition had kept old characters,supplied the missing words of Guanzi and had different orders too.But Zhonglisizi edition had many omitted sentences and superfluous words.It also had omitted some annotates.
Keywords:Zhonglisizi edition  Zhejiang edition in Nan Song Dynasty
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号