Shifting sands that threaten policy advocacy for vulnerable children and youth: A case study |
| |
| Institution: | 1. ACLU of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States;2. University of Michigan, United States;1. Institute for Child Health Policy, University of Florida, PO Box 100177, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA;2. Department of Human Development, Eckerd College, 4200 54th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL, 33711, USA;3. University of Florida, PO Box 100177, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA;1. Health Equity Research Lab, Cambridge Health Alliance, 1035 Cambridge Street, Suite 26, Cambridge, MA 02141, United States;2. Boston Children''s Hospital, 575 Mount Auburn Street, Suite 101, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States;3. Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, United States;4. Partners North Shore Physicians Group, United States;5. Hasbro Children''s Hospital/Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903, United States |
| |
| Abstract: | Recent changes in the institutional and political environment, including the rise of a neoliberal logic that favors private solutions to social problems and increasing political partisanship, have created new challenges for statewide legislative advocacy. Yet, there is a lacuna in the study of the sector’s response to new and contradictory environmental pressures. Using the lens of institutional and resource dependence theories on organizations, this qualitative case study targets this gap by examining how a nonprofit statewide legislative advocacy organization for vulnerable children has responded to shifting political and institutional conditions that have transpired since its founding in the early 1990s. It examines 1) how the organization has made sense of these emerging challenges and demands, 2) how these shifts have reshaped its advocacy practices, and 3) how they have influenced the viability of the organization. Adaptive responses of the organization included a shift in emphasis from direct legislative advocacy to advocacy directed at the implementation of policy and grassroots advocacy. Implications for the future of statewide legislative advocacy for vulnerable children are discussed. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
