| 论间接侵犯商业秘密罪的主观方面 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 何正泉.论间接侵犯商业秘密罪的主观方面[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2001,21(5):132-134. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 何正泉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中南财经政法大学,研究生部,湖北,武汉,430074 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 间接侵犯商业秘密罪的主观方面为“明知或者应知”,根据词义理解,应包括故意和过失,但将“应知”理解为过失显然有不合理之处,对此学者也有不同观点。本文通过对立法本意的揣测和对“应知”的深层理解,主张应对“应知”作合理解释,不应包括过失。
|
| 关 键 词： | 主观方面 应知 立法本意 过失 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5439(2001)05-0132-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年2月28日 |
On the Subjective Aspect of Infringement on Commercial Secret |
| |
| HE Zheng,quan.On the Subjective Aspect of Infringement on Commercial Secret[J].Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities:Humanities and Social Science,2001,21(5):132-134. |
| |
| Authors: | HE Zheng quan |
| |
| Abstract: | The subjective of aspect on the infringement of commercial refersto is"knowing perfectly well "or "should know" According to the interpretation of the works ,it should contains "intention" and "negligence",There's something illogic if"should know"is interpreted as "negligence",and scholars'opinions differ.in this With the deliberation of the original meaning of the legislation,and the deep understanding of "should know",the author argues that"should know"should be interpreted properly,excluding negligence. |
| |
| Keywords: | subjective aspect "should know" the original meaning of the legislation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
