质疑判例法源

在我国的刑法典确定了罪刑法定原则之后 ,怎样弥补刑法的漏洞又成了一个重要的话题。许多学者支持将判例法做为一种救济方法 ,提出建立成文法为主 ,判例法为辅的具有中国特色的社会主义法律体系。本人不支持这种观点。理由是 ,君权神权这一判例法产生的历史根源已不存在 ;随着法制建设的迅速发展。法制不完备、不统一的现象趋于消亡 ,而判例法赖以生存的遵循先例原则也存在严重弊端。因此 ,我们在判例法这一问题上 ,必须冷静而谨慎 ,合理吸收其精华、精髓而不能拘泥于形式。

Questioning Law''''s Source of Legal Precedent

After legal principle of crime and punishment was decided in crminal code,how to compensate for loophole of criminal law has become an important issue.A lot of scholars suport that legal precedent should be a method of compensation and put forward establishing written law which is compensated for with legal precedent that is the system of law with the Chinese characteristics.This paper denies the view.The reason is that the historical source of legal precedent produced by monarchical power and divince authority has not existed with the development of legal system's construction.The imperfection's phenomenon in legal system will tend to disappear.The serious defects exist in the following precedent on which legal precedents depend.Therefore we must keep cool and careful to deal with the problem,and attract its cream and quintessence but not adhere to form.