| 翻译的诗学批评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 汤富华. 翻译的诗学批评[J]. 扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2013, 0(5): 116-122 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 汤富华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 扬州大学外国语学院,江苏扬州225009 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 基金项目：全国教育科学规划办“十二五”规划2011年度教育部重点课题项目（GPA115040） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自亚里斯多德的《诗学》问世以来，中西文艺界乃至思想界对于诗学的探索绵恒久远。然而诗学的现代趣旨不是看诗歌如何表现美，更是看诗歌语言何以成为关。雅克布逊以降的形式主义诗学继承发展了亚里斯多德的诗学遗产，区分了日常语言与诗歌语言，还原了语言诗学功能，指出使得日常语言成为诗的是语言的陌生化表达方式，在很多场合下恰好是翻译实现了这一目标。翻译诗学同样关注语言的美学问题，形式主义诗学则为其重要理论来源。
|
| 关 键 词： | 诗歌翻译 翻译诗学 诗学批评 |
Poetic Criticism of Translation |
| |
| TANG Fuhua. Poetic Criticism of Translation[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2013, 0(5): 116-122 |
| |
| Authors: | TANG Fuhua |
| |
| Affiliation: | TANG Fuhua (School of Foreign Languages, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Long since Aristotle, Chinese and western literary world have been focusing on poetic ex- ploitation among social elites in the field of literature and arts and the world of thoughts Modern poet- ics dwells upon just how poetry is created a piece of art out of verbal messages instead of watching its aesthetic effects only. By developing Aristotle＇s poetic heritage. Jacobson and his followers distingui- shes everyday language and poetic language and reduces poems to its poetic function o~ language. It is made clear that the defamiliarization of languages is vital to its poetic effects, which happens to be u- sually realized by translation. Poetics of translation pays the same attention on aesthetics and formal- ist poetics might be the most important resource of its thought. |
| |
| Keywords: | translation of poems poetics of translation poetic criticism |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
