儒学的"内在超越性"与"历史总体"问题——从分析牟宗三、李泽厚、安乐哲诸观点出发

近代以来,儒学的宗教性问题成为儒学研究的焦点,当代新儒家兴起后,这一问题转化为对儒学超越性的讨论。针对牟宗三的内在超越性经由实体化的心体走向独断论,李泽厚与安乐哲提出了不同观点。李泽厚反对任何形式的超越性,主张以情本体来取代超越性;安乐哲则强调应该消解儒学的超越性本质,代之以开放性的过程哲学。但二人皆有从根本上取消儒学超越性品格之嫌。通过吸收三家的观点,在李泽厚礼由俗出和文化积淀说的基础上,本文提出,应该从历史总体的视角来分析儒学超越性问题。在这一视角中,一方面,儒学具有内在超越性的品格,另一方面,这种内在超越性应该来源于开放性的不断发展的社会历史过程。

"Internal transcendence" of Confucianism and "History as a whole"——From the Prospective of Analyzing Mou Zongsan, Li Zehou and Roger T.Ames' Views

After 1840,the religious nature of Confucianism became a focus point of research.As the rise of modern Confucianism,this point transfers to the discussion of internal transcendence.For Mou Zongsan's internal transcendence runs through the entity of the Mind to dogmatism,Li Zehou and Ames provides a representation of different points of view.Li opposed to any form of transcendence,advocated Emotion ontology to replace the transcendence.Ames stressed the transcendence essence of Confucianism should be abolish...