论产品质量法上的瑕疵给付责任

我国《产品质量法》第40条的规定在性质上应为瑕疵给付责任,属于债务不履行的一种表现形态;瑕疵给付责任的效力在我国立法上表现为补正措施、合同解除(退货)和损害赔偿,与大陆法系、英美法系国家相比,缺少价金减额请求权的规定,不利于消费者利益的维护;基于交易便捷的考虑,在瑕疵给付责任的实现上应该突破合同相对性原则,其权利主体不应局限于真正购买产品的消费者,义务主体以销售者为主导,承担一种较为严格的责任,生产者则承担类似于一般保证的补充责任。

On the Liability of Flaw Payment in the Product Quality Law

This paper suggests that the Article 40 in the Product Quality Law should fall within the liability of flaw payment. Essentially, the liability belongs to a sort of debt non-performance, and in effect it takes the forms of remedial measures, contract release and compensation for damages. In addition, during the apportionment of liability, the holders of rights should not be restricted to the consumers in verity, producers also be included and charge for their supplement liability of general guaranty, representing the idea of the distributor-dominant duty subjects.