首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

评杨大堉、胡肇昕补《仪礼正义》
引用本文:彭林.评杨大堉、胡肇昕补《仪礼正义》[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(2).
作者姓名:彭林
作者单位:清华大学历史系
摘    要:胡培翚《仪礼正义》是清代礼学研究的重要著作,历来受到好评。然而,《仪礼》17篇,胡培翚仅完成12篇即已去世,其余《士昏礼》、《乡饮酒礼》、《乡射礼》、《燕礼》、《大射礼》五篇12卷,乃是其门人杨大堉以及族侄胡肇昕所补,而学者多将两者混为一体。杨、胡所补部分的水准究竟如何,能否与胡培翚的原作匹配,事关对《仪礼正义》的整体评价。杨、胡补《仪礼正义》各篇存在违背胡培翚既定体例、排弃贾公彦之说、引用文献不当、失于截断、前后失照等比较突出的问题,其学术水准明显不如胡培翚原作,读者不可不明辨于此。

关 键 词:胡培翚  《仪礼正义》  杨大堉  胡肇昕

About the Supplements of Ceremony and Rirual by YANG Da-yu and HU Zhao-xin
PENG Lin.About the Supplements of Ceremony and Rirual by YANG Da-yu and HU Zhao-xin[J].Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences),2007(2).
Authors:PENG Lin
Abstract:HU Pei-hui's Ceremony and Rirual is an essential work of etiquette research of the Qing dynasty. It was always praised highly in academic circles. However, HU Pei-hui just finished 12 sheets and passed away. The last 5 sheets 12 volumes like are written by his disciple YANG Da-yu and his nephew HU Zhao-xin. As scholars are not always distinguish this. What about their supplement standard? Can it match with the original? This related with the evaluation of the work . Their supplements exist such problems as: disobey HU Pei-hui's law and have unsuitable quotations, contradictions and so on. Their academic standard cannot compare with HU Pei-hui's original work obviously. Readers please notice this.
Keywords:HU Pei-hui  Ceremony and Rirual  YANG Da-yu  HU Zhao-xin  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号