首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

区块链电子证据的研究与思考
引用本文:刘学在,阮崇翔. 区块链电子证据的研究与思考[J]. 西北民族大学学报, 2020, 0(1): 52-59
作者姓名:刘学在  阮崇翔
作者单位:;1.武汉大学法学院
基金项目:2017年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“民法典制定背景下程序法与实体法融合机制研究”(项目编号:17YJA820017)
摘    要:区块链技术与电子证据的结合是区块链技术的法律化应用又一创新,最高人民法院通过司法解释认可了区块链电子证据的合法性。区块链电子证据产生的目的是通过区块链技术补足电子证据一些先天性弱点,但不论从电子证据的证据资格认定还是电子证据在司法实践中经常不予采纳的理由,区块链电子证据的优势并不明确。过分的推崇工具的先进性而忽略司法实践中的问题,无益于法律与技术的相互结合。区块链电子证据存证作为一种法律工具,应当理性回归其工具价值。

关 键 词:区块链  电子证据  区块链存证  证据资格  采信困境

Research and Reflection on Blockchain Electronic Evidence
Liu Xuezai,Ruan Chongxiang. Research and Reflection on Blockchain Electronic Evidence[J]. Journal of Northwest University for Nationalities, 2020, 0(1): 52-59
Authors:Liu Xuezai  Ruan Chongxiang
Affiliation:(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
Abstract:The combination of blockchain technology and electronic evidence is another innovation in the legal application of blockchain technology,and the Supreme People’s Court has recognized the legitimacy of blockchain electronic evidence through judicial interpretations.The purpose of blockchain electronic evidence generation is to complement some of the congenital weaknesses of electronic evidence through blockchain technology,but the advantages of blockchain electronic evidence are not clear in terms of the identification of electronic evidence and the reasons why electronic evidence is often rejected in judicial practice.It is not beneficial to combine law and technology by over-extolling the advancement of the tool and ignoring the problems in judicial practice.As a legal tool,blockchain electronic evidence certificate should rationally revert to its tool value.
Keywords:blockchain  electronic evidence  blockchain certificate  evidence qualification  credibility dilemma
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号