首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

完善我国缓刑制度的几点思考
引用本文:郭书山.完善我国缓刑制度的几点思考[J].河南社会科学,2004,12(4):55-57.
作者姓名:郭书山
作者单位:郑州大学,法学院,河南,郑州,450052
摘    要:我国刑法关于缓刑的立法设置仍然存在着有待进一步完善的地方:立法应当设定一个统一的适用标准来判断何谓缓刑的实质条件———不致再危害社会;公安机关仍然应当是最适宜的缓刑考察机关,不过公安机关和群众监督要相互依存、相互制约;建议增加行业人士介入到缓刑考察的过程中;对因为犯新罪而被撤销缓刑的,新罪在犯罪性质或刑罚种类上可作一些必要的限制;刑法应当肯定缓刑也能减刑。

关 键 词:缓刑  缓刑犯  缓刑制度  考察机构  减刑
文章编号:1007-905X(2004)04-0055-03
修稿时间:2004年5月6日

Some Reflections of Perfecting Our Country's System of Probation
Guo Shushan.Some Reflections of Perfecting Our Country's System of Probation[J].Henan Social Sciences,2004,12(4):55-57.
Authors:Guo Shushan
Abstract:In the criminal law of our country, there still exist many insufficiencies concerning the stipulation of probation. therefore it is an urge to make further improvement. firstly, it is very necessary to set up an universal standard to judge what is the substantive term of probation--unlikely to endanger society once more. secondly, public security organs remain the most proper ones to shoulder the responsibility to investigate probation on condition that they do so under the surveillance of the masses. Thirdly, an appeal that professionals be allowed to take an active part in the cource of probation investigation is also put forward, in the article. What's more, it is essential to set limits to the new crime for which the probation is annulled. Finally, It should be clearly stated in the criminal law that probationers also have the right to acquire abatement of penalty.
Keywords:probation  probationer  probation system  investigation organs  abatement of penalty
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号