东南亚七国政体比较研究

在全球性经济与政治自由化的浪潮中，文莱的二元君主制政体及其所表现出的权力高度集中表达出它仍处在宪政主义的萌芽状态。在其他六国中，多种政体共存，既体现了宪政主义对文化和历史的包容性，如在虚位国家元首化下，柬埔寨、泰国的君主立宪制照顾了王族和僧侣的文化性和宗教性，马来西亚的君主立宪制则吸纳了世袭苏丹的历史性和地方性，且此三国都建立了立法与行政分立的议会和政府以及相应的议会内阁制；也体现了对政体形式的超越。菲律宾和印度尼西亚确立的立宪主义总统制和包含总统相对实位化元素的新加坡议会制均在于防御集权和威权主义的复辟。宪政主义框架下的不同形式的政体已在东南亚各国成为主流。

Comparative Study on the Mornarchy of the Seven Countries in Southeast Asia

In the global economic and political liberalization tide, the highly power centralization of duality monarchy expresses that it is still in the embryonic state of constitutionalism in Brunei. In other countries, various political institutions embody culture and history in constitutionalism, for example, in the trend of virtue head of state, the constitutional monarchy in Kampuchea and Thailand contain culture and religion of the royal family and monks. In the absence of the heads of state of the constitutional monarchy to take care of the royal family and the monks of culture and religion, Malaysia's constitutional monarchy absorbs the history and locality of hereditary Sultan. And these countries have established the legislative and executive powers by the legislative and administrative division and the corresponding parliamentary cabinet system, which also reflects the transcendence to the form of government. The purpose of Philippine and Indonesia establishing constitutional presidential system and Singapore establishing parliamentary system which contains elements of relative real position president, is to prevent centralized and authoritarian restoration. Different form of political institutions under the constitutional framework has become the mainstream in the Southeast Asian countries