| 自决权理论的“三种版本”：比较与评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王英津. 自决权理论的“三种版本”：比较与评价[J]. 学术探索, 2009, 0(6): 41-45 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王英津 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学,国际关系学院,北京,100872 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自决权理论在产生和发展的过程中，由于受到多重因素的影响，形成了三种不同的版本，即马克思主义的自决权、国际法上的自决权和西方学者的自决权。这三种不同版本的自决权对于自决权的性质、适用范围和内容等有着不同的主张。我们在理解和把握自决权的内涵时，应以国际法版本为主，以另外两个版本为辅。
|
| 关 键 词： | 自决 自决权 自决权的版本 |
A Comparative Study of the Three Versions of the Self-Determination Theories |
| |
| WANG Ying-jin. A Comparative Study of the Three Versions of the Self-Determination Theories[J]. Academic Research, 2009, 0(6): 41-45 |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Ying-jin |
| |
| Affiliation: | WANG Ying - jin (School of International Relations, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Considering the right of self- determination, different theories of the Marxist self- determination, the there have appeared, along with its development, three self-determination in international law, and the self- determination by Western scholars. Each has different interpretation on self- determination concerning the nature, scope and contents. It is suggested that the international law version should be given top priority, with the other two as the supplement. |
| |
| Keywords: | self- determination the right of self- determination the versions of self- determination right |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
