On inclusion probabilities and relative estimator bias for Pareto πps sampling

A means for utilizing auxiliary information in surveys is to sample with inclusion probabilities proportional to given size values, to use a πps design, preferably with fixed sample size. A novel candidate in that context is Pareto πps. This sampling scheme was derived by limit considerations and it works with a degree of approximation for finite samples. Desired and factual inclusion probabilities do not agree exactly, which in turn leads to some estimator bias. The central topic in this paper is to derive conditions for the bias to be negligible.Practically useful information on small sample behavior of Pareto πps can, to the best of our understanding, be gained only by numerical studies. Earlier investigations to that end have been too limited to allow general conclusions, while this paper reports on findings from an extensive numerical study. The chief conclusion is that the estimator bias is negligible in almost all situations met in survey practice.