首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

《论语》“夫子不为卫君”章的政治哲学解读
引用本文:柯小刚. 《论语》“夫子不为卫君”章的政治哲学解读[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 22(1): 70-76
作者姓名:柯小刚
作者单位:同济大学人文学院,上海,200092
摘    要:在卫君继嗣正统问题上,《论语·述而》篇中的"夫子不为卫君"章与《公羊春秋》哀公三年传里的讲法,表面看起来似有抵牾。但是,通过对春秋正统思想的梳理,以及对《论语》所蕴含的春秋微言的解读,可以发现二者在政治哲学思想上的深层一致。其一致性可以归结为通三统而大一统的"春秋道统"。

关 键 词:正统  《论语》  《春秋》  微言大义

A Politic-Philosophical Interpretation of the Relation between Analects of Confucius and Chunqiu
KE Xiao-gang. A Politic-Philosophical Interpretation of the Relation between Analects of Confucius and Chunqiu[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Social Science Section), 2011, 22(1): 70-76
Authors:KE Xiao-gang
Affiliation:KE Xiao-gang (School of Humanities,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)
Abstract:Who should be the right crown prince of State Wei?It seems that Analects of Confucius and Chunqiu have raised different answers.However,after closer reading,we find out that there lies deeper coherence between the two opinions.The coherence is a politic-philosophical one,which will bring Analects of Confucius and Chunqiu into each other,under the common principle of the Daotong.
Keywords:Zhengtong  Analects of Confucius  Chunqiu  sublime words with deep meaning
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号