首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

张资平:在“历史情境”与“历史叙述”中
引用本文:巫小黎.张资平:在“历史情境”与“历史叙述”中[J].佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版),2005,23(5):8-12.
作者姓名:巫小黎
作者单位:上海师范大学,人文与传播学院,上海,200234
摘    要:在现代文学的"历史情境"中,许多研究者都将张资平与郭沫若等并称"创造社"四大金刚",而在文学史叙述中,张氏却始终无法摘去"三角恋爱作家"、"汉奸文人"的帽子.这之间的巨大裂痕,原因主要有三1.权力叙事干扰了文学史家的独立判断;2.道德至上的历史伦理观,影响了文学史家的公正评价;3.文学史研究未能把作家-作品-读者"三位一体"的文学生产、消费系统看做一个不可分割的整体.因此,我们还应该有一部全面考察文学接受的文学史.

关 键 词:张资平  文学史观  现代文学  文学接受史
文章编号:1008-018X(2005)05-0008-05
修稿时间:2005年5月23日

A Historical Comment on Zhang Ziping
WU Xiao-li.A Historical Comment on Zhang Ziping[J].Journal of Foshan University(Social Science),2005,23(5):8-12.
Authors:WU Xiao-li
Abstract:In the historical context of modern literature, Zhang Ziping, like Guo Moruo, is regarded as one of the four masters in the Creation Group by many researchers. But in literature history, he can not put off the cap as a triangle love writer and a traitor writer. The reasons for this disparity are as follows:1) authoritative narration has interfered with literary historians' independent judgment. 2)historical ethical view that thinks highly of morals has influenced the fair evaluation of literary historians. 3) literary historical study has not considered writer-works-readers as inseparable unity.
Keywords:Zhang Ziping  literary historical view  modern literature  literary reception history  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号