关于“尊德性”与“道问学”研究

自朱陆"鹅湖之争"以来,关于"尊德性"与"道问学"的争论一直未间断过,且有愈演愈烈之势。对于此问题的争论,之所以备受关注,并成为"千古不可和之异"(王阳明语),究其原因,主要因为这次论争,既是中国哲学史上第一次较为完整的方法论的理论自觉论争,也是第一次比较成熟和理性的思想和方法的论争,而对于此问题的回答又关涉到为人及为学的问题;因此,无论是从"尊德性"还是从"道问学"出发,都将面临一个二者都无法统一的悖论。有鉴于此,笔者想在探析此问题渊源的基础上,对历代学者与此争论有关的认识与看法进行客观的分析,以期找出古人在此方面的某些可借鉴性因素,从而为当今社会风气建设及为学次第等问题的解决提供一些有益的参考。

The Study on "Pursuing Virtue" and "Seeking for Knowledge"

Since the famous struggle between CHU His and LU Jiu-Yuan,the debate between "pursuing virtue" and "seeking for knowledge" has never stopped.The reason for the great attention lies in that this struggle was not only the first theoretical awareness of complete methodology in Chinese philosophy,and also the first mature and rational debate of thoughts and methods.The answers to this issue involve the ideals of how to conduct oneself and learn.Whether you choose the first one or the second one,you will be confronted with a paradox.Given that,the author analyzes the origin of the struggle firstly,then puts forward an objective analysis of previous researches’ views and opinions,and at last the author attempts to propose some perspectives with the purpose of providing some beneficial inspiration for our social construction.