| 我国侦查程序辩护制度的缺陷与对策研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王艳.我国侦查程序辩护制度的缺陷与对策研究[J].绍兴文理学院学报,2008,28(5). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王艳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江工商大学法学院,浙江,杭州310018 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 浙江省法学会课题“我国刑事侦查程序辩护制度的缺失与对策研究”(08NB11)成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国1996年刑诉法确立了时间提前但作用有限的侦查阶段律师准入制度。时间提前是保障人权思想的亮点,而作用有限则是打击犯罪,规避律师隐性危险的需要。这种变革在当时无疑是立法的进步,但是随着时间的推移,在司法实践中暴露了越来越多的问题,严重危及到刑事被控方权利的保障和辩护职能的发挥。以审前程序人权保障的视角,围绕我国侦查、起诉环节中辩护制度的疏漏,提出了应确立的司法理念和完善立法之举措。
|
| 关 键 词： | 侦查程序 辩护制度 人权保障 |
The Shortcomings of and Betterment for the System of Advocacy of Investigation Procedure in China |
| |
| Wang Yan.The Shortcomings of and Betterment for the System of Advocacy of Investigation Procedure in China[J].Journal of Shaoxing College of Arts and Sciences,2008,28(5). |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Yan |
| |
| Abstract: | In 1996,it was established in the Chinese criminal procedure law that the time lawyer was permitted to participate in investigation was advanced and the function the lawyer played was limited.Time advanced is to protect human right and function limited is to crack down criminal activities and avoid lawyer's hidden danger.This kind of reform was undoubtedly the progress of legislation at that moment,but as time goes by,more and more problems appear in judicial practice,severely endangering the protection of ... |
| |
| Keywords: | investigation procedure system of advocacy protection of human right |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
