| 综论《文选》的编者问题(上)--从文献可信度层面上辨"与刘孝绰等撰"说不能成立 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 力之.综论《文选》的编者问题(上)--从文献可信度层面上辨"与刘孝绰等撰"说不能成立[J].江汉大学学报(人文科学版),2005,24(1):33-40. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 力之 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广西师范大学中文系,广西 桂林 541004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《古今诗人秀句序》的"昭明太子萧统与刘孝绰等撰集《文选》"与《中兴书目》注的昭明太子"与何逊、刘孝绰等撰集"《文选》说,是被学林普遍用以证明《文选》为萧统与刘孝绰等编纂一说最主要的"客观材料",但是这两条"客观材料"是没有从文献可信度层面辨析的。其说难以成立。《文选》只能是昭明太子一己之所撰。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文选 编者问题 文献可信度 《古今诗人秀句序》 《中兴书目》小注 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-6152(2005)01-0033-08 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年11月3日 |
Comprehensively On Compliers of Anchology |
| |
| LI Zhi.Comprehensively On Compliers of Anchology[J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Education,2005,24(1):33-40. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Zhi |
| |
| Abstract: | Gujin Shiren Xiuju Xu "Xiaotong, Prince Zhaoming, Liu Xiaochuo and other people compiled Wenxuan" quoted from Preface to The Refined Sentences Of Ancient And Modern Poets and "Prince (Zhao)ming, He Xun and Liu Xiaochuo compiled Wenxuan together" annotated in Resurgence Bibliography are the main objective materials cited by most scholars to prove that Xiaotong, Liu Xiaochuo and other people are the compilers of Wenxuan, which, however, is not discriminatively analyzed from the aspect of the fidelity of literature. The two objective materials prove to be untenable if analyzed from the aspect of the fidelity of literature. Wenxuan is not compiled by Prince Zhaoming, Liu Xiaochuo and other people but by Prince Zhaoming alone. |
| |
| Keywords: | Wenxuan complier the fidelity of literature Preface To The Refined Sentences Of Ancient And Modern Poets note from Resurgence Bibliography |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
