| 论法院调解书再审之完善 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张一博,陈忠.论法院调解书再审之完善[J].湖南工业大学学报（社会科学版）,2011,16(6):53-55. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张一博 陈忠 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 广西大学法学院,广西南宁,530004
2. 株洲市人民检察院,湖南株洲,412008 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 当前的法院调解书再审司法监督主体缺失,事由简略,既不符合法院调解书性质的内在需求,也难以满足法院调解复兴的客观需要,有必要依据"查明事实,分清事非"的标准,遵循合法原则,对其加以相应的完善,进而为相关当事人合法权益的保障提供坚实的基础。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法院调解书 司法监督主体 再审事由 |
| 收稿时间： | 2011/9/28 0:00:00 |
Improvement of Count Conciliation Statement in the Retrial Proceeding |
| |
| ZHANG Yibo and CHEN Zhong.Improvement of Count Conciliation Statement in the Retrial Proceeding[J].Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition),2011,16(6):53-55. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Yibo and CHEN Zhong |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Law School,Guangxi University,Nan Ning,530004,China; 2.People’s Procuratorate of Zhuzhou City,Zhuzhou,Hunan,412008,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Currently, the subject of judicial supervision has no power to start the retrial of court - conciliation statement. Besides, the items of the retrial of court - conciliation statement are extraordinary simple. It is short of the essential requirement of the quality of court - conciliation statement and dropped behind the historical trend of the revival of court - conciliation statement. As a result , both ＂bringing to trial by facts and the law＂ and ＂law principle＂ should be perceived as the most important foundation to develop the retrial of the system . Furthermore, it provides better legal protection for parties. |
| |
| Keywords: | court of the mediatory statement subject of judicial supervision items of the retrial |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《湖南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《湖南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
