首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

宋代诉讼中减少诬告的规范及措施
引用本文:李华.宋代诉讼中减少诬告的规范及措施[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2013,15(2):90-94.
作者姓名:李华
作者单位:长安大学政治与行政学院,陕西西安,710064
基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费基础研究项目
摘    要:根据详实史料,探索宋代法律为减少诬告现象所制定的有关诉讼程序规范。如从年龄和身体健康两方面限制投状者范围,状书不得匿名或多名,状书内容要明确,不得含糊称疑,投状者必须签写反坐状等等,这些措施实施效果良莠不一。在具体司法实践中,司法官员通过采取在灾荒年减少案件受理、膀示诬讼案件、严惩贪图私利的官吏以及在主刑外附加从刑等方式,寓教化于刑罚,以期减少诬讼现象。

关 键 词:宋代  诬讼  投状  附加刑

Norms and measures to reduce false charge during legal proceeding in Song dynasty
LI Hua.Norms and measures to reduce false charge during legal proceeding in Song dynasty[J].Journal of Chang'an University(Social Sciences Edition),2013,15(2):90-94.
Authors:LI Hua
Institution:LI Hua (School of Politics and Administration, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China)
Abstract:There were particular rules when legislators made penalty on crime of false charge in Song Dynasty. Besides, they had made legal proceeding rules to reduce false charge. Prosecutor's qualification was restricted by his (her) age and health. Any record couldn't be anonymous and should have explicit statement. Prosecutor had to underwrite guarantee after he handed over record. Justices took measures to their best to reduce false charge. They cut down the acception of records in disaster year and pasted case if it was approved malign. They threw the book at the officials if they defalcated during disposing malign cases. In addition, they took additive penalty to avoid false charge.
Keywords:Song Dynasty  false charge  prosecution  additive penalty
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号