首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

以正当程序来审视瑕疵证据的补正和合理解释
引用本文:吴柳清,姚宪弟,周山. 以正当程序来审视瑕疵证据的补正和合理解释[J]. 山西农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 0(2): 125-128
作者姓名:吴柳清  姚宪弟  周山
作者单位:太原科技大学法学院,山西太原030024
摘    要:正当程序理念是英美法系法律思想、法律传统的体现,是公民个人所享有公平的最低限度标准,也是人类对正义理想的追求。从正当程序角度审视瑕疵证据的补正和合理解释,通过分析我国司法实务中对瑕疵证据的补正和合理解释的适用情形,说明在立法和司法上对正当程序的偏离,进而回归瑕疵证据本身,以后来看其对正当程序的影响。

关 键 词:正当程序  程序瑕疵  瑕疵证据  补正和合理解释

To Review the Remedy and the Justifiable Explanation of Defective Evidence with Due Process
WU Liu-qing,YAO Xian-di,ZHOU Shan. To Review the Remedy and the Justifiable Explanation of Defective Evidence with Due Process[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition, 2014, 0(2): 125-128
Authors:WU Liu-qing  YAO Xian-di  ZHOU Shan
Affiliation:(The Law School, Tai yuan University of Science and Technology, Tai yuan Shanxi 030024, China)
Abstract:The thought of due process embodies the western legal tradition, and is the minimum standard of fairness individual citizens enjoyed and the pursuit of the human justice ideal. This article, from the perspective of due process, reviews the remedy and justifiable explanation of defective evidence. Through analysis the remedy and justifiable explanation of defective evidence applied in the situation of judicial practice, the paper explains the legislative and judicial deviations for due process, and also reveals the impact of due process by returning defective evidence itself.
Keywords:Due process  Procedural defect  Defective evidence  Remedy and justifiable explanation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号