首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国行政诉讼第三人界定标准的检视与重构
引用本文:吴卫军,陈岩.我国行政诉讼第三人界定标准的检视与重构[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,32(5):120-123.
作者姓名:吴卫军  陈岩
作者单位:电子科技大学,法律系,四川,成都,610054
摘    要:行政诉讼第三人界定标准的功能在于准确确定行政诉讼第三人,科学合理的界定标准应当具有明确性、灵活性、经济性、公正性等特征。但是,由于我国立法设计的不足,导致现行行政诉讼第三人界定标准存在较大缺憾,引发了实践中的一系列问题。因此,应在检视与反思现行立法规定,借鉴大陆法系国家有益经验的基础上,从明确第三人参诉的连结点、合理界定利害关系的内涵与外延两方面重构我国行政诉讼第三人的界定标准。

关 键 词:行政诉讼第三人  界定标准  应然特征  利害关系
文章编号:1005-6378(2007)05-0120-04
修稿时间:2007年2月12日

Introspection and Reconstruction of the Third Person's Definition Criterionin Chinese Administrative Lawsuit
WU Wei-jun,CHEN Yan.Introspection and Reconstruction of the Third Person''''s Definition Criterionin Chinese Administrative Lawsuit[J].Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science),2007,32(5):120-123.
Authors:WU Wei-jun  CHEN Yan
Abstract:The function of the third person's definition criterion in administrative lawsuit is to exactly define the third person to attend the administrative lawsuit.Scientific and rational criterion should be characterized by its explicitness,flexibility,economy,impartiality and so on.Because of its legislative drawback,the third person's definition criterion in Chinese administrative lawsuit has many defects,triggering off a series of practical problems.So,we should reconstruct the third person's definition criterion in Chinese administrative lawsuit from defining the junction of the third person's attending lawsuit and rationally defining the connotation and denotation of the interest by inspecting and introspecting the existing law,and learning lessons from the countries in continental legal system.
Keywords:the third person in administrative lawsuit definition criterion ideal character interest
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号