首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

法院与公安机关调解书的适用、效力及表述
引用本文:刘跃敏.法院与公安机关调解书的适用、效力及表述[J].广州大学学报(社会科学版),2002,1(5):97-100.
作者姓名:刘跃敏
作者单位:广东公安高等专科学校,广东,广州,510232
摘    要:调解书的制作方法都大同小异 ,同者为正文都写案件事实和调解协议 ,写作要求相近 ;异者之一则是法律效力及其表述。而这无不受法律的制约。人民法院调解书和公安机关调解书有各自的适用范围及法律效力 ,而公安机关调解书的法律效力尤其特殊 ,故法律效力的表述不可模仿人民法院的调解书 ,“治安调解书与裁决书具有同等效力”的写法是片面的、错误的 ,是违反法律规定的

关 键 词:调解书  适用范围  生效时间  效力及其表述
文章编号:1671-394X(2002)05-0097-04
修稿时间:2002年3月10日

On the Applicability, Efficiency and Expression of the Mediating Instruments of People's Courts and Public Security Organs
LIU Yue-min.On the Applicability, Efficiency and Expression of the Mediating Instruments of People's Courts and Public Security Organs[J].Journal of Guangzhou University(Social Science Edition),2002,1(5):97-100.
Authors:LIU Yue-min
Abstract:The methods of compiling the mediating instruments for the people's courts and for the public security organs are mostly alike except for slight differences.Alike,because both include the facts of the cases and the mediating agreements with similar writing patterns in the main body of the texts.Different,because they are not the same in legal authenticity and the expression. Both,however,are restrained by the law.The mediating instruments for the people's courts and those for the public security organs have their own range of applicability and legal authenticity,with particular feature of the instruments for public security organs.So the expression of the authenticity should not take the form as used in the instruments for the people's courts.It is one_sided,wrong to put in the instruments such expression as "Both the mediating instruments of public order and the adjudicating instruments are equally authentic",and that is an expression violating the law.
Keywords:The mediating instruments  the range of applicability  the starting time for effectiveness  authenticity and expression
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号