首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论波普对能动主义历史观的批评
引用本文:陈炯. 论波普对能动主义历史观的批评[J]. 华中师范大学研究生学报, 2011, 0(3)
作者姓名:陈炯
作者单位:华中师范大学政法学院;
摘    要:在《历史决定论的贫困》一书中,波普将历史决定论划为反自然主义学说和泛自然主义学说两类。在对二者作了详细的定义后,又进行批判,认为二者都不能成为科学理论。本文主要讨论的是历史决定论中的反自然主义学说,也就是马克思著作中提到的能动的历史观。笔者将本书中波普反对能动的历史观的理由进行了归纳,通过分析,笔者认为波普站在唯科学主义的立场来否定马克思关于具体社会问题和趋势之思想的合法性,是一种标准的不合时宜。

关 键 词:历史决定论  能动主义历史观  唯科学主义  整体主义  

A Study on the Karl Popper's Criticisms of the Anti-naturalistic Doctrines of Historicism
CHEN Jiong. A Study on the Karl Popper's Criticisms of the Anti-naturalistic Doctrines of Historicism[J]. Huazhong Normal University Journal of Postgraduates, 2011, 0(3)
Authors:CHEN Jiong
Affiliation:CHEN Jiong(College of Political Science and Law,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
Abstract:In The Poverty of Historicism,Popper divided historicism into the anti-naturalistic doctrines of historicism and the pro-naturalistic doctrines of historicism. After identifying the two doctrines,Popper criticized them that they are not scientific theory. This paper focuses on the the anti-naturalistic doctrines of historicism which is also believed by Karl Marx. The author generalizes a conclusion from the reasons that Popper opposed the anti-naturalistic doctrines of historicism that the standard of Scien...
Keywords:historicism  activism history  scientism  holism  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号