从国际法视角看钓鱼岛的归属

钓鱼岛在历史上一直是中国的领土，1895年后被日本强行侵占。二战后，日本被迫遵守有关的国际法文件归还了从中国攫取的台湾、澎湖列岛及东北地区。而本因一并交还的钓鱼岛却因为美国敌视新中国的原因没有实现，美国擅自非法地将二战中临时占领的钓鱼岛“交还”给了日本，从而为钓鱼岛的归属问题埋下了种子。尽管钓鱼岛目前仍被日本侵占，但这改变不了它归属中国的法律性质。本文将从国际法的角度对钓鱼岛的领土归属问题进行客观的分析，并对日本主张钓鱼岛主权的观点一一剖析。作为学术文章，实事求是、以理服人才是根本。因而，本文力图以历史事实为根据，以国际法为准绳，客观地评析钓鱼岛的主权归属。

On the Wwnership of Diaoyu Island from the Perspectives of International Law

Diaoyu Island has been China＇s territory since ancient times. During the 2nd World War it was occupied by Japan. After the war the island should have been returned to China if it were not for American intervention at the excuse of security. Nevertheless, the fact that it belongs to China cannot be altered. This paper makes a study on its ownership based on international law.