| 动词"到、去、上"的差别及其中和 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张会娟. 动词"到、去、上"的差别及其中和[J]. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2001, 46(1): 71-75 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张会娟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东师范大学,中文系,山东,济南,250014 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "到、去、上"三个动词表运动义时,在是否具有到达义上、是否是自主动词、自由动词以及在运动方向上都存在着一系列差别,但在谓语是动宾结构而情态是未然的句子和谓语是连动结构的句子中,这三个词的意义差别可以实现中和.
|
| 关 键 词： | 到 去 上 自主 运动方向 中和 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-5973(2001)01-0071-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000-10-31 |
Differences and Neutralization of the Three Verbs "Dao,Qu, Shang" |
| |
| Zhang Huijuan. Differences and Neutralization of the Three Verbs "Dao,Qu, Shang"[J]. Journal of Shandong Teachers' University(Social Science Edition), 2001, 46(1): 71-75 |
| |
| Authors: | Zhang Huijuan |
| |
| Abstract: | When the three verbs "arrive "(dao), "go"(qu) and "shang" refer to a sense of moving, they are different in many aspects, such as whether they have a meaning of arrival or whether they are self-mastered and free verbs. However, in the sentences which have verb-object structures with a future mode, and in the sentences where co-ordinate verbs appear, the differences of the three are neutralized. |
| |
| Keywords: | dao qu shang self-master direction of moving neutralization |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
