| Abstract: | Summary The purpose of this article is to examine the published viewsof two leading politicians who can claim to speak for theirparties. From their discussion of poverty and social deprivation(and the terms will be used interchangeably) an attempt willbe made to emonstrate that their policies or proposals reston similar assumptions about society and a similar model ofpoverty. Their consensus of approach will mean that no alternativepolicies are being seriously mooted within the party politicalsystem. Their assumptions will be examined critically and thesuggestion made that an approach deriving from an alternativemodel is required to counter poverty. |
