首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

《涉江》的"伍子"为"伍子胥"无误辨
引用本文:力之. 《涉江》的"伍子"为"伍子胥"无误辨[J]. 云梦学刊, 2002, 23(4): 10-12
作者姓名:力之
作者单位:广西师范大学,中文系,广西,桂林,541004
摘    要:不论从横的层面看,还是从纵的角度说,《涉江》中的“伍子”都只能是“伍子胥”而断不会是伍奢,即王逸之说确然无误。另外,《惜往日》与《悲回风》说到“子胥”这对证《涉江》的“伍子”为“伍子胥”有意义,而对证明其所自出的作品是否屈原作无价值。

关 键 词:王逸  涉江  伍子  伍子胥  考辨
文章编号:1006-6365(2002)04-0010-03
修稿时间:2002-04-07

ARGUMENT ON THE PERSON WU ZI IS WU ZIXU IN SHE JIANG
LI Zhi. ARGUMENT ON THE PERSON WU ZI IS WU ZIXU IN SHE JIANG[J]. Journal of Yunmeng, 2002, 23(4): 10-12
Authors:LI Zhi
Abstract:It is mot only judged from the athwartship, but also from the lengthways, the person Wu Zi in the She Jiang, must be Wu Zixumbut can' t be Wu She, which meaning that the view of Wang Yi is not wrong. In addition, the Zi Xu in the Xi Wang Ri and Bei Hui Feng is meaningful for proving Wu Zi is really Wu Zixu in She Jiang, while it is useless for proving the writer of She Jiang is Qu Yuan.
Keywords:Wang Yi  She Jiang  Wu Zi  Wu Zixu  investigate and distingwish  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号