首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

竞争供应链中制造商环保技术投资决策研究
引用本文:杨振华,冯展斌,沈强,董晓松. 竞争供应链中制造商环保技术投资决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 164-175. DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1965
作者姓名:杨振华  冯展斌  沈强  董晓松
作者单位:1.江西科技师范大学商学院,江西 南昌330036; 2.上海海事大学经济管理学院,上海201306;3.南昌大学经济管理学院,江西 南昌330031
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71902079);江西省教育科学“十四五”规划项目(21YB138);江西省“双千计划”首批培养类哲学社会科学领军人才项目(jxsq2019203033).
摘    要:本文考虑消费者对质量差异化产品的异质性偏好以及环保意识,建立了消费者效用函数以及产品需求函数,构建了差异化竞争制造商及其零部件供应商之间的动态博弈模型;进而,研究了竞争供应链中制造商环保技术投资策略,考察了市场竞争对供应链均衡定价决策、环保技术投资决策以及消费者福利的影响。研究结果表明:拥有较高技术水平的制造商总是会选择更高的环保技术投资水平,但消费者也需为此支付更高的产品溢价;制造商环保技术投资会影响产品销售价格并有利于提升消费者福利,拥有较高技术水平的制造商总是有动机选择投资环保技术,而技术水平较低的制造商则不会有动机选择投资环保技术;市场竞争会导致供应商和制造商定价决策的变化,但此时供应商反而能够获得更多利润。

关 键 词:环保技术投资;市场竞争;质量差异化;消费者福利  
收稿时间:2020-10-19
修稿时间:2021-02-22

Optimal Environmental Technology Investment of Manufacturers in Competitive Supply Chains
YANG Zhen-hua,FENG Zhan-bin,SHEN Qiang,DONG Xiao-song. Optimal Environmental Technology Investment of Manufacturers in Competitive Supply Chains[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(7): 164-175. DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1965
Authors:YANG Zhen-hua  FENG Zhan-bin  SHEN Qiang  DONG Xiao-song
Affiliation:1. School of Business, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330036, China;2. School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China;3. School of Economics and Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
Abstract:In recent years, with the development of the economy, consumers have higher and higher requirements for corporate environmental protection, and more and more companies have begun to pursue green, low-carbon, and sustainable development. For example, the three-way catalytic converter technology in the automobile industry can effectively improve the utilization rate of gasoline and reduce exhaust gas emissions such as carbon monoxide; Heat pump technology and frequency conversion technology in the air conditioning industry can reduce energy consumption. However, in a competitive market environment, companies also need to consider the impact of competitors’ market pricing and environmental investment strategies when determining their own environmental technology investment decisions. This not only complicates the enterprise environmental technology investment decision-making process and the competition and cooperation game relationship, but also may lead to the imbalance of corporate decision-making incentives and the loss of corporate performance. As a result, by constructing three-stage game model between one supplier and two competing manufacturers, it is aimed to study how should manufacturers determine their environmental investment strategies and price strategies in a competitive market environment? How can manufacturers adjust pricing and environmental investment decisions to maintain their competitive advantage and maximize profits? And what impact will environmental technology investment have on supplier pricing, profits, as well as consumer purchasing behavior and consumer welfare?
Keywords:environmental protection technology   market competition   quality differentiation   consumer welfare,
点击此处可从《中国管理科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国管理科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号